Saturday 19 November 2016

Deception is Just as Bad as telling an Outright Lie


               I personally agree with this statement and the reason behind it is that sometimes there is not such a big difference between the way we would define deceiving someone or lying to someone. Deceiving would be considered convincing one of something that is not true, which is in the end lying, the only observable difference here being the premeditation or purpose behind a deceiving attempt. It is true that lying could have the same result overall yet it would lack the previously mentioned premeditation.
                Taking for example a documentary about the Invasion of Iraq in 2003, (Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMsK4F5VOsE) we can notice examples of deception which was applied and lead to a result which was the same as if an outright lie was told. One of the aspects that stood out for me was the difference between American media and Al Jazeera, and especially their views. The senior producer of Al Jazeera, Samir Khader, mentioned that people should be informed of exactly what is happening, “there is a war around you, something is happening in the world; you’re still sleeping; wake up!”. During the interview at the Military Centre, the military mentioned how Saddam Hussein has supposedly threatened the Americans with weapons of mass destruction, statement which is later discarded by the military when more questions on the topic are asked by the interviewer, by saying “I misunderstood your question”. This signals the deception of people at the time. They were deceived into believing that Saddam Hussein was threatening the USA, which was the reason for the attacks. Linked to this comes also the transmissions in which Americans mentioned that the casualties were limited, yet it was in contradiction with the images published by Al Jazeera. Overall, the American media as stated by Samir Khader was promoting the idea of people from both the USA and Iraq being under threat. This could be developed into a perception of safety provided by the action of military forces in Iraq, again deceiving the Americans. Journalist for Al Jazeera, Hassan Ibrahim, mentioned that he had faith in the American public that they were going to understand what is going on and stop the war, yet as we can see, the deception here was something that was in the way of this happening, showing again how deception can be as bad as a lie.
Al Jazeera was also initially accused of being biased, showing only footage of American troops and not of Iraqi troops and their negative actions, yet in defense, Al Jazeera journalists mentioned that there is no one that has that kind of footage, showing that overall every media, including themselves, can be biased in what type of information they present and what they leave aside, and this contributes to the deception of the population.

Sunday 13 November 2016

Pastiche


Rationale:
This article shows bias towards the matter of gun control laws in America, overall highlighting the republican ideology supporting weapon carrying. The pastiche is re-written as to display a bias emphasizing a democrat ideology, opposing weapon carrying.  

 Pastiche:

Billionaire businessman and presidential candidate Donald Trump always speaks in vague generalities and does not offer specifics about where he stands on the issues.
There is however one exception and that is his stance on gun rights and the Second Amendment, as Trump just released his official policy position on his campaign website.
“The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period,” the position paper began.Trump went on attempting to convince people of how the government should not be able to take away this right since it has not been created by the government in the first place and nor can it be taken away by it. Describing the Second Amendment as “America’s first freedom,” Trump, used the argument that it helps protect the entirety of rights we currently have.
Instead of adding new gun control laws, Trump proposed tougher enforcement of laws that are already on the books which are supposedly going to protect and defend that right.

Moreover, instead of reducing the probability of gun attacks taking place by limiting the access to guns, Trump relies on the reduction in these attacks by sentencing gun criminals to mandatory minimum five-year sentences in federal prison, noting that crime rates are supposedly going to fall dramatically when criminals are taken off the streets for lengthy periods of time.
Trump also proposed strengthening and expanding laws allowing law-abiding gun owners to defend themselves from criminals using their own guns, without fear of repercussion from the government.
Nevertheless, Trump blames the recent shootings on clear mental problems that should have been addressed, and proposes fixing our nation’s broken mental health system by increasing treatment opportunities for the non-violent mentally ill, but removing from the streets those people who pose a danger to themselves and others, overall refusing the idea of gun and magazine bans which are deemed by him as being ineffective.
Not only are these bans not going to be established but Trump proposed as well a national right to carry, a national concealed carry reciprocity law that would compel states to recognize the concealed carry permits of any other state, as if the right to carry a gun would be equal to the right of holding a driver’s license which would be accepted by all states.